Colorado Health Care Cooperative Legislative Agenda Interim Committee


Why does the Health Care Cooperative Matter?  Access to health care is a matter of survival for uninsured people.  As we do not have access to health care we end our lives as much as thirty years prematurely.  No access to health care is a not a matter of being insured it is a matter of being able to live a full life without fear of being unable to pay your bills.

 Contact Rep. McCann TODAY to support SJR13-021, Interim Comm. on health care solutions

Supporters of the CO Health Care Cooperative,

SJR13-021, which calls for an Interim Committee to study ways to create a comprehensive health care system for all Coloradans, has passed the Senate and will be heard and voted ontomorrow in the House Committee on Health, Insurance and Environment. We are writing constituents of the members of that committee who have not yet committed to this bill to ask you to contact your representative and urge her/him to support the bill. Your Representative in the House is Beth McCann, who is chair of the Committee. We have just learned that she may be opposing the bill.

Below is some information about the bill, which simply calls for a series of 6 meetings around the state to invite all those who are affected by the current costly and dysfunctional health-care system to come together to discuss their concerns, proposals, and insights, and try to find common ground on a Colorado solution to this economic and health-care crisis.

If you agree with the goals of SJR13-021, please contact Rep. McCann with a brief e-mail or phone call to let her know that you support the bill and urge her to support it too. You can use a talking point from the list below or provide your own.

A sample message would be:

Dear Rep. McCann,

Thank you for all the hard work you have done this session to increase access to health care for thousands of Coloradans. As your constituent in District 8, I support SJR13-021 because it builds on the progress you have made, and urge you to support it too. I believe it would _________________________________.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

your name

address

phone #

Talking points supporting SJR-021, “Interim Committee to Study Ways to Create a Comprehensive Health Care System for All Coloradans”

1. Health care is a non-partisan issue; it affects every Coloradan, every family, community, business.

2. Health care or the lack of it affects and increases the costs of our schools, our criminal justice system, community safety, and other vital areas of our lives.

3. Because of escalating costs of health care for our state–currently $50 B plus/yr–it will continue to drain funds from just about every other issue people are concerned about: education, environment, job development, infrastructure, etc.

4. We have to get a handle on costs, or our system of financing and delivering health care will continue to drain funds.

5. The amended bill calls for a more diverse membership for the Interim Committee: people who represent all the stakeholders, and brings them together to discuss the issue calmly and respectfully.

6. The people of CO are an important resource, and the committee would be wise to seek their input.They deal w/ budgets in their family, their businesses, their communities. Not only are they patients and providers themselves, they know how to discern what works, what doesn’t work, where funds are being wasted. They could be brought into this important discussion by holding some of the committee meetings in different regions of the state.

 Thank you so much for helping in this vital way to bring quality, affordable health care to all Coloradans!

Eliza Carney, Coordinator

Legislation Task-force

Co-operate Colorado

970-416-0636

www.co-operatecolorado.org

 

Colorado Center on Law and Policy Analysis 2nd Anniversary of the Affordable Care Act


Health Law and Policy Update
This week’s updates

todayToday is the second anniversary of the Affordable Care Act 
President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law on March 23, 2010. The law has already made health care insurance more available to Coloradans. Because of the law, health insurance companies must spend most of your premiums on medical services and face stricter limits on what’s allowed for administrative costs. Starting in 2011, the law required insurance companies to spend at least 85 percent of the premium dollars they collect on medical care and quality improvement in the large-group market. The requirement is 80 percent for insurance companies that sell plans to individuals and families in the small-group market. The standards that require a set portion of premiums an insurance company can spend on health care, rather than administrative costs, marketing and profits are collectively known as medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements. Health insurance companies that do not meet the standards must provide rebates to consumers. The standards help to ensure Coloradans get high-value health coverage for their premium dollars.

Before the medical loss ratio requirements became law, there was a hodgepodge of rules across the nation regarding whether insurers must report MLRs or meet minimum MLR requirements. The Colorado Division of Insurance now requires insurers to meet minimum MLR requirements: 65 percent for insurers selling plans in the individual market, 70 percent in the small-group market, and 75 percent in the large-group market. The requirements are significantly less than what the health reform law requires. During the past five years, Colorado’s 10 largest health insurers by enrollment have reported an average MLR of about 83 percent. In 2010, five of the 10 largest health insurers in Colorado had MLRs of less than 80 percent, meaning they would not have been compliant with the MLR requirements under the Affordable Care Act. Because of the MLR requirements in the health reform law, insurers must evaluate rates and consider lowering premiums or provide consumers with rebates. The requirements provide unprecedented accountability for health insurance companies while ensuring Coloradans get meaningful value for their premium dollars.

A Feb. 16 report from the Colorado Division of Insurance explores health insurance costs in the states, including medical loss ratios. The federal Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight offers a fact sheetcovering federal rules governing medical loss ratios.

During March, Health Law and Policy Update will feature key facts about health reform to inform advocates and the public about the law. Other facts highlighted so far:

Headlines of the week

hospitalHospital Payment Assistance Program passes Senate
The Colorado Senate on Tuesday passed the Hospital Payment Assistance Program, which would give uninsured patients the opportunity to understand and responsibly pay their hospital bills without the fear of being sent to collections or going into bankruptcy. Senate Bill 12-134 is sponsored by Sen. Irene Aguilar, D-Denver, and supported by the Colorado Center on Law and Policy. 

Aguilar’s leadership helped unite consumers and Colorado hospitals behind the bill, which passed the Senate by a vote of 28 to 6. The measure now moves to the House Committee on Health and Environment, where it is being sponsored by Rep. Cindy Acree, R-Aurora.

Find news coverage from the Colorado Springs Gazette, the  Denver Business Journal and Colorado Public News. Learn more about the Hospital Payment Assistance Program on CCLP’s Policy Matters blog.

argumentArgument in health reform challenge begins Monday at U.S. Supreme Court 
The U.S. Supreme Court on will begin hearing arguments Monday on the legal challenges to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. A ruling is expected in June. The justices will consider four issues for six hours during three days: 

  • Whether the anti-injunction act means the court cannot take up the case until someone has to pay a penalty for failing to purchase health insurance, sometime after 2014. Argument will be heard 10 a.m. Monday, March 26.
  • Whether the minimum coverage provision of the law that requires most people to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty beginning in 2014 is constitutional. Argument will be heard 10 a.m. Tuesday, March 27.
  • Whether some parts of the act can be upheld even if other parts are ruled unconstitutional, known as severability. Argument will be heard 10 a.m. Wednesday, March 28.
  • Whether the expansion of Medicaid in the law is a valid exercise of Congress’ spending authority. Argument will be heard 1 p.m. Wednesday, March 28.

While the arguments are not being televised, the court will make same-day transcripts available on through links on its website. The scheduling order, and petitions and briefs are also on the court’s website.

cardReport card underlines connections between low-income and poor health
Colorado is holding its own overall among the states but making little progress in improving residents’ health status, according to a sixth-annualHealth Report Card the Colorado Health Foundation issued Thursday.

The report card’s grades rest on 38 indicators of health, which include such factors as vaccination rates, early prenatal care, obesity levels, activity levels and health insurance coverage.   It organizes its findings around five life stages.  One Colorado grade improved slightly (healthy children went from D+ to C-), one went down a bit (health aging moved from A- to B) and the other three (healthy beginnings, healthy adolescents and healthy adults) stayed flat at C, B- and B respectively. The findings were prepared in conjunction with the Colorado Health Institute.

Especially in connection with health indicators for children and adolescents, the report card cites poverty as a factor in Colorado’s inadequate grades.  According to the report card, more than 18 percent of Colorado children age 12 and younger, and more than 14 percent of Colorado adolescents lived in families with incomes at or below the federal poverty level during 2008-2010.  

Perhaps even more troubling, Colorado has the nation’s second-fastest growth in child poverty (children younger than 18) measured between 2000 and 2010, according to the State of Working Colorado 2012, a publication issued Thursday by the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, a project of the Colorado Center on Law and Policy.

reportReport: Colorado health systems perform better than most peers

All of Colorado’s communities except Greeley were in the top half of communities ranked nationwide for health system performance, according to a report issued last week by The Commonwealth Fund.

The report measured the performance of the systems using 43 indicators including costs, prevention and treatment, access to services, and measures of health such as smoking rates and infant mortality. Boulder ranked 38th of the 306 areas, while Denver was ranked 98th, Fort Collins 99th and Colorado Springs 129th. The Greeley area, ranked 159th, was the only part of Colorado to place in the bottom half of areas nationwide.
 
Compared to their overall performance, local areas in Colorado performed worse on indicators focusing exclusively on access, which measures the share of children and adults with health insurance, the share of at-risk adults who have visited a doctor recently and other factors. Denver was ranked No. 162 of the 306 areas for access, partly because about 90 percent of children in the area are insured, versus the median of 94 percent for all areas in the study.
 
Boulder and Grand Junction were two of the top three areas nationwide for having the lowest potentially preventable deaths per 100,000 people, a measure of healthy living. Boulder also was in the top three for having the lowest percentage of obese adults, and Grand Junction was among the top three with the lowest potentially avoidable emergency room visits for enrollees in Medicare.
 
Local areas of Colorado and other states can be compared by using The Commonwealth Fund’s interactive map.

premiumPremium increases in nine states deemed unreasonable
Federal regulators have deemed health insurance premium increased in nine states “unreasonable,” the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said Thursday. The designation was made under rate review authority granted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

“Thanks to the Affordable Care Act consumers are no longer in the dark about their health insurance premiums,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a news release. “Now, insurance companies are required to justify rate increases of 10 percent or higher. It’s time for these companies to immediately rescind these unreasonable rate hikes, issue refunds to consumers or publicly explain their refusal to do so.”

Two insurance companies proposed unreasonable rate increases, up to 24 percent, in states including Arizona, Idaho, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. The announcement came with a report examining how premium rate review granted in health reform is playing out in the states. Among the findings:
 

  • States like Texas, Kentucky, Nevada and Indiana are reporting fewer requests for rate increases over 10 percent.
  • States like California, New York, Oregon, and many others, have proactively lowered rate increases for their residents.
  • The rate review program has made insurance companies explain their increases, and more than 180 have been posted publicly and are open for consumer comment on the federal government’s health care website.
Advancing the debate

transparencyTransparency will help improve value for consumers and employers
Among provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that could contain costs, a rule issued in February requires health plans to issue a uniform summary of coverage for all enrollees and applicants, the Kaiser Family Foundation reports in a new blog post. The provision is the most popular part of the health reform law, a Kaiser poll found. More transparency will help consumers and employers compare and select plans that offer the best value. The blog post details the uniform summary of coverage rule and other key transparency provisions of the law.

“With so much attention devoted to the ACA’s controversial requirement that individuals be insured and debates at the state level of whether to set up health insurance exchanges, the variety of provisions that would promote health insurance transparency have perhaps been somewhat lost in the shuffle,” the post said.

healthHealth care law to have ‘mixed’ effects on immigrants
Immigrants will see “mixed impact” from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an article in The American Prospect says. Legal immigrants will benefit from insurance subsidies, whereas undocumented immigrants will be ineligible. More states may adopt a simpler process for verifying citizenship for the Children’s Health Insurance Program and Medicaid benefits, because that same process will be used in health insurance exchanges created by the act. Some undocumented workers also will benefit from the act because of expanded funding for community health centers, which will help all immigrants receive services, whether they have insurance or not. The act could make immigration reform more costly and less likely, according to the 2010 article, because millions of people granted amnesty from reform would be eligible for insurance subsidies created by the act.
 
million47 million live in places where access to dental care is difficult
report on gaps in dental care nationwide led last week’s The Progress Report from The Colorado Health Foundation. The dental care report, issued in February by U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, for a Senate subcommittee he chairs, says 47 million people live in places where access to dental care is difficult. In 2009, about 17 million children in low-income families received no dental care. The Denver Post in Februaryreported on dental care in Colorado, The Progress Report noted, and The New York Times earlier this month looked at increases in preschoolers with cavities and the use of anesthesia in a front-page story.

What’s new

americansAmericans share how health reform has helped
People across the country are sharing stories about how they’ve been helped by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as part of an educational initiative the federal government announced March 16. The program is known as My Care.

“When I travel across the country, I hear stories of hard-working people struggling with the health care system, being denied care when they need it most, making choices between paying the mortgage or filling their prescription drugs, and dealing with the anxiety of problems that no family should have to face,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a news release. “The law eases this stress and helps put the power back into the hands of consumers instead of insurance companies.”

spanishSpanish version of health care site offered
Spanish-language version of the healthcare.gov website is offered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Both the Spanish and English versions help consumers find insurance options and explain the features of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Sections of both sites also direct consumers to government websites that allow users to compare the quality of hospitals, nursing homes and other health care providers.

 

National Outreach Guidelines for Universal Populations


National Outreach Guidelines

for Underserved Populations

 

 

Purpose of the Project

Outreach is a critical function of health centers serving underserved populations.  Outreach brings primary care services to underserved and/or marginalized community members where they live, work, and congregate. Outreach educates the community about the availability and appropriate use of health care services, improves patient follow-up and long-term case-management, and reduces health care needs and health disparities.

In 2000, Health Outreach Partners developed a set of Farmworker Outreach Program Guidelines.  These guidelines were based on 30 years of experience providing outreach services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers, and on the critical input of a National Review Panel, which was comprised of professionals working in the migrant health field and serving farmworkers in various capacities.  The guidelines provided suggested strategies for the delivery of outreach services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. 

In 2012, Health Outreach Partners, together with the National Association of Community Health Centers, National Health Care for the Homeless Council, the Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations, and Migrant Health Promotion, will release their National Outreach Guidelines for Underserved Populations.  These guidelines will be informed by a National Advisory Panel made up of representatives from local, state and national organizations that serve populations including low-income families, individuals experiencing homelessness, immigrant communities, racial and ethnic minorities, migrant and seasonal farmworkers, and other vulnerable populations.  The guidelines will provide benchmarks for most effectively using outreach to increase access to care in priority communities.  Ideally, health centers address each of the guidelines in some way.  Concrete strategies will be suggested under each guideline to guide program efforts.

Definition of Outreach

Health Outreach defines outreach as the process of improving people’s quality of life by facilitating access to quality health care and social services, providing health education, bringing linguistically and culturally responsive health care directly to the community, helping people to become equal partners in their health care, and increasing the community’s awareness of the presence of underserved populations.

Enabling Services  are non-clinical services provided to patients to support care delivery, enhance health literacy, and facilitate access to care.   Many enabling services are performed by comprehensive outreach programs, including: 

  • Education about the availability and appropriate use of health services
  • Health Education
  • Case Management
  • Eligibility assistance and financial counseling
  • Interpretation
  • Transportation 

While “outreach” is often included in the definition of enabling services, the term “outreach” is used as an umbrella term for the purposes of this project.  Outreach, as envisioned in the National Outreach Guidelines, includes but is not limited to the enabling services described above. 

Outreach Functions

Community Health Centers and other community-based health organizations use individuals in a variety of capacities and roles to promote health care access and reduce health disparities.  Programs may include staff and/or volunteers who work full-time, part-time, year-round, or seasonally.  Some staff or volunteers work primarily in the community; others spend significant time assisting patients in the health center setting.  Individuals performing key outreach functions may go by any number of titles, including:

  • Community Health Worker
  • Outreach worker
  • Promotor or Promotora de Salud
  • Camp Health Aide
  • Health Navigator
  • Lay Health Advisor
  • Lay Health Promoter
  • Community Health Advocate
  • Community Health Representative
  • Eligibility and Enrollment Specialist
  • Case Manager
  • Health Educator
  • Patient Navigator

Other health center staff may also conduct or participate in outreach activities.   Other staff performing outreach functions may include:

The National Outreach Guidelines are intended as a vision for what a truly comprehensive community health outreach model should include. 

 Different organizations will operationalize the Guidelines in different ways depending on a number of factors, including: the size of the organization; financial and staffing resources available to the organization; characteristics of priority communities; barriers to care for the priority communities; geographic considerations; and opportunities for community collaboration.

Health Care Policy at the State Assembly – Federal Government


Colorado Center on Law and Policy Bulletin

Health Law and Policy Update
This week’s updates

Headlines of the week

threatsThreats and rhetoric around health reform persist at the Colorado General Assembly
A bill introduced in the Colorado General Assembly would repeal the law establishing Colorado’s Health Insurance Exchange if the U.S. Supreme Court declares any part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. Senate Bill 12-053 is sponsored by Sen. Tim Neville, R-Littleton, and Rep. Marsha Looper, R-Calhan. The bill establishing the exchange passed last year, and Colorado was the only state to pass such a law with bipartisan support. 

The Colorado Health Benefit Exchange will offer a competitive marketplace where individuals and small businesses can purchase health insurance. Find more information about the exchange in previous editionsof the Health Law and Policy Update.

coloradoColorado House passes resolution to repeal health reform law
A Colorado House Joint Resolution calling for a federal constitutional convention to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed the House on Thursday. It is another in a series of efforts to repeal the law debated over the past two years by the Colorado General Assembly. The bill is unlikely to pass the Colorado Senate. The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument on the constitutionality of the health reform law in March and is expected to issue a decision by the end of June. 

Repealing health reform – and its vital consumer protections – would have a devastating effect on the tens of thousands of Coloradans who are benefiting from the law and countless more who will benefit from continued implementation. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act:

  • Parents of children with pre-existing conditions are able to purchase insurance for their children.
  • Insurance companies may no longer impose lifetime limits on coverage.
  • Annual limits are phasing out.
  • Companies cannot drop customers from coverage if they get sick.
  • Children can be covered under their parent’s policies until they reach age 26.
  • Colorado’s seniors have access to no-cost preventive services, are receiving help with the cost of prescription drugs and, by 2020, will no longer have to worry about the “donut hole” gap in prescription drug coverage.
  • Colorado’s high-risk pool for people who cannot get insurance, GettingUsCovered, has more than 1,000 enrollees.

FamiliesUSA has compiled a complete list of reforms that have already gone into effect. An issue brief the Colorado Center on Law and Policy released in March 2011 reviews how the reforms played out in Colorado.

healthHealth care attorney joins CCLP
Health Care Attorney George Lyford joined the Colorado Center on Law and Policy’s Health Care Program team this month. Lyford previously worked as a staff attorney for the Health Care Access Program at Nebraska Appleseed Center for Law in the Public Interest and as an attorney for Mary Kay Hansen Law & Mediation. Lyford earned a law degree from the University of Nebraska College of Law. Reach him by e-mail or at 303-573-5669, ext. 310.

universityUniversity of Colorado Hospital will negotiate to run Memorial Health System
The Colorado Springs City Council on Jan. 10 voted to proceed with negotiations for University of Colorado Hospital to run city-owned Memorial Health System. The move is a significant step toward shifting management control of one of the state’s largest hospital systems. Memorial Health System has been overseen by a panel appointed by the City Council.

University of Colorado Hospital was one of several bidders seeking control of the Colorado Springs system. The university hospital proposes to add Memorial to a new University of Colorado Health System, which will also include Fort Collins-based Poudre Valley Health System and Denver-based Children’s Hospital Colorado. The university hospital is seeking a 30-year lease of Memorial.

Once a lease is negotiated, and the City Council approves it, the plan would be subject to an election of city voters, likely late this year. The Gazette newspaper of Colorado Springs offers an overview of how the deal has developed. 

The Colorado Center on Law and Policy has urged the City Council to ensure any lease with University of Colorado Hospital includes a commitment to maintain Memorial’s level of charity care. A letter CCLP sent Jan. 5 to City Council President Scott Hente outlines the agency’s concerns, which CCLP Special Counsel Ed Kahn also expressed in anarticle posted on the Health Policy Solutions website.

reportReport focuses on building links between Medicaid, exchanges and individual market
A new report from the National Academy of Social Insurance highlights the importance of ensuring a seamless continuation of coverage for individuals who move between eligibility for Medicaid and tax subsidies offered through health insurance exchanges to be operational by 2014. 

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, various affordability programs will help individuals gain access to coverage. Those include Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), advance premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions available in the exchanges. However, the report states, “more than a third of all adults with family incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level can be expected to experience sufficient income fluctuation to shift from Medicaid to the Exchange or the reverse.” That fluctuation could result in interruptions in treatment and providers, which might lead to ineffective treatment or even ceasing treatment altogether.

The authors note that states have a great deal of flexibility in determining how to integrate Medicaid, CHIP, the exchanges and individual market. States, including Colorado, are faced with decisions regarding to what extent providers and health plans participate between markets (Medicaid, the exchange, or the individual market). Those decisions will affect an individual’s ability to continue treatment with his or her doctor, regardless of changes in eligibility. The authors conclude ensuring a seamless continuation of coverage “begins with the establishment of a coordination mechanism at the state level, governed by the agencies involved in coordination and inclusive of the stakeholder interests in a more unified operation.”

What’s next

hcpfHCPF announces a series of regional outreach meetings
State health policy officials are trying to alert residents to important changes in the Medicaid program by holding meetings across the state. The Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (HCPF) is holding the meetings to discuss the Medicaid expansion to adults without dependent children whose incomes are up to 10 percent of the federal poverty level, the new Medicaid buy-in program for adults with disabilities and Colorado PEAK (the online application for public benefits). The two new Medicaid programs will be implemented this spring.

The meetings begin Jan. 30 in Glenwood Springs and will continue through February. There will also be several webinars in February and the beginning of March. The department is asking for advance registration.Find details on a flier

HCPF’s Medical Services Board on Jan. 13 approved the final eligibility rule changes for the plan to allow Medicaid eligibility to some adults without dependent children. People with incomes up to 10 percent of the federal poverty level will be eligible, and the program will be capped at 10,000 participants. Applicants may begin submitting applications April 1, and the department plans a lottery in May to fill the spots. 

Advancing the debate

medicaidMedicaid history
We thought it would be useful as we move into a legislative session that will focus on the value and role of the Medicaid program in Colorado to give you some background about the program. 

Medicaid and Medicare were signed in to law by President Johnson in 1965. The Act, which passed by a large bi-partisan majority, was hailed as an enormous step forward for the nation. President Johnson upon signing the bill into law said: 

Many men can draft many laws. But few have the piercing and humane eye which can see beyond the words to the people that they touch. Few can see past the speeches and the political battles to the doctor over there that is tending the infirm, and to the hospital that is receiving those in anguish, or feel in their heart painful wrath at the injustice which denies the miracle of health to the old and to the poor. And fewer still have the courage to stake reputation and position, and the effort of a lifetime upon such a cause ….

Because the need for this bill is plain, and it is so clear indeed that we marvel not simply at the passage of this bill, but what we marvel at is that it took so many years to pass it.

 

The full text is posted online.

Medicaid was designed to serve two primary functions – the program offers medical insurance to those poor enough to qualify for cash assistance and complements the Medicare program by paying for long-term care for people without resources. Over the years, Medicaid has continued to insure the poor and pay for long-term care for the disabled and elderly. Medicaid eligibility as well as the services and benefits offered under the program expanded as our nation grew more interested in and aware of the long term benefits of offering preventive care and treatment for children and pregnant women, as we came to value home and community based long term care, and as we realized that seniors could not access Medicare benefits if they were unable to pay Medicare premiums and copayments. 

Medicaid also has played its intended role by shoring up those losing jobs and health insurance during recessions – we have seen that play out these last few years in Colorado as our Medicaid roles have expanded significantly. Finally, Medicaid contributes substantially to states’ economies by bringing in billions of federal dollars. What follows are some key milestones in the program nationally and in Colorado. Where we go from here and whether we honor the intent of a law, which President Truman said “puts this Nation right where it needs to be, to be right” will be the subject of much debate and discussion over the next few months. 

Some key milestones:

1965 – the program mandated coverage for certain populations, including families receiving cash assistance as well as certain services including physician, inpatient and outpatient hospital care, lab and x-rays and skilled nursing facility care. States had the option to cover other populations and services and receive a federal match for doing so. From the beginning, Medicaid supplemented the Medicare program by covering long term care. Medicaid was initially administered by the Social Rehabilitative Administration which focused on poverty and welfare programs. 

1967- EPSDT (Early Periodic Screening Diagnostic and Treatment) services were added to Medicaid. EPSDT ensures that children receive screening and treatment for all medically necessary services until age 21. This was the era when policy makers began to recognize that children living in poverty were exposed to environmental hazards (like lead paint) and had inadequate access to basic and preventive care. The growing recognition that many conditions could be cured or ameliorated by screening (for example for lead exposure) and cured by early diagnosis and treatment was the impetus behind EPSDT. In 1989, EPSDT was expanded to require coverage for services even if those services were not covered for Medicaid adults. 

January 1969 – Colorado establishes a Medicaid program. By 1972 all states are participating in the program, except for Arizona, which holds out until 1982. 

During the Carter administration an effort begins to expand coverage under the program to children. While that effort fails, various coverage expansions for children and pregnant women are realized throughout the 1980s. 

1981 – Beginning of expansion of managed care in Medicaid. Colorado has had a varied experience with Medicaid managed care and enrollment has waxed and waned over the years. The discussion about managing care in the Medicaid program resurfaced over the last two years as the state initiated the Accountable Care Collaborative project which is designed to coordinate care, in a fee for service environment. 

Home and Community Based Services waivers allowed. Colorado was an early adopter of HCBS (1985) and continues to offer significant supports so that people who need long term care can remain in the community. 

The Reagan administration proposes to block grant Medicaid. This is the beginning of a battle that resurfaces periodically. The federal government is interested in using block grants to control spending by giving states a fixed allocation of Medicaid dollars, rather than an open ended entitlement to receive matching funds for program expenditures. Some states are interested in the discussion because they want to manage the program free from certain federal requirements. Ultimately block grants may shift significant costs to the states by locking them into a fixed federal dollar allocation, regardless of changes in circumstances, such as increased enrollment during a recession. Block granting also raises concerns about increased state discretion to waive protections that assure that people in Medicaid can access the services they need. 

1986 – Medicaid eligible undocumented immigrants are now covered under Medicaid for emergency care (only). Medicaid coverage for immigrants has been a hot button issue for decades. In 1996, Congress required that most immigrants reside lawfully in the U.S. as “Qualified Aliens” for five years before they become eligible to enroll in Medicaid (with exceptions for refugees, asylees and certain others). 

1996 – Welfare reform (the Personal Responsibility and Welfare Reform Act) severed any formal link between cash assistance and Medicaid. 

1997 – State Children’s Health Insurance Program becomes law. Colorado enacts the Children’s Basic Health Plan, also known as CHP+, in 1998. While Colorado receives a federal dollar for every state dollar spent in the Medicaid program, the state receives a two to one match for CHP+. 

1999 – Olmstead Decision by the U.S. Supreme Court requires, in many instances, the provision of community based long-term care services on an equal basis with institutional care. 

2000 – Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act. Coverage for prevention and treatment becomes a state option with an enhanced federal match. In a hard fought battle, Colorado adopts the program in 2001. 

2001 – Health Insurance Flexibility and Accountability (HIFA) waivers created. This was a Bush administration initiative designed to offer states more flexibility in their Medicaid programs. Colorado’s Department of Health Care Policy and Financing brings forward a HIFA proposal in 2005. The proposal goes nowhere because of the potential implications of federal budget neutrality requirements on Medicaid and the state’s General Fund. 

 

2003 – In an attempt to save money during an economic downturn, Colorado temporarily eliminated eligibility for pregnant women in CHP+ and capped enrollment for children. The CHP+ caseload fell dramatically and did not recover until about 2006. Colorado also ends Medicaid eligibility for lawfully present immigrants, even if they have been in the U.S. for more than five years. The move also ended long-term care for lawfully present immigrants, so people in nursing homes and receiving  community based long term care services would have lost those services. Many of these immigrants turn out to be Russian Jews; some are holocaust survivors. An injunction related to the adequacy of termination notices stops them from losing eligibility until the General Assembly reinstates coverage in 2005. 

2004 – Colorado passes Amendment 35, establishing a tobacco tax. In 2005, the Colorado legislature passes a bill directing a portion of the revenue generated to increase eligibility for pregnant women and children in CHP+, reinstate eligibility for lawfully present immigrants, and eliminate the asset test for children and parents, among other changes. 

2005 – Federal Deficit Reduction Act adds new flexibility and authority to increase cost sharing in Medicaid. New proof of identify and citizenship requirements added to the Medicaid program which creates access problems for U.S. citizens in Colorado. A significant number of Medicaid applicants who are U.S. citizens have difficulty today accessing the required documents.

December 2007 – Official start of the Great Recession. Colorado sees growth in Medicaid caseloads that correlate to the economic downturn in subsequent years.

2009 – The Colorado Health Care Affordability Act establishes a hospital provider fee that enables Colorado to draw down new federal matching funds that are used in subsequent years to expand Medicaid and CHP+ coverage for children, pregnant women, and low income parents. Adults without Dependent Children, who make less than about $1,089 a year, and working people with disabilities will become eligible for Medicaid in 2012. No Colorado General Fund is used to support the program. 

2009 – American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) -provides states with enhanced Medicaid matching funds which helps them through the recession. Colorado’s Medicaid caseload begins to grow as people lose jobs. ARRA prohibits states from reducing Medicaid eligibility. The Children’s Health Insurance Program is reauthorized this year.

2010 – Health reform (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA) passes and creates expansions in the Medicaid program for people up to 133 percent of poverty without the former adherence to categories of eligibility to take effect in 2014. PPACA continues the prohibition on reducing eligibility for Medicaid until 2014 and in CHP+ until 2019.

The timeline is adapted from material compiled by the Kaiser Family Foundation in Medicaid: A Timeline of Key Developments and the Colorado Health Institute in Colorado Medicaid.